<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Field Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:49:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-1219</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/#comment-1219</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been using write-in-the rain notebooks for years. http://www.mindbird.com/rite.htm I don&#039;t love them but they have one feature that keeps me coming back. If they can get wet, very wet and are fine. Very helpful in an occupation like mine.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using write-in-the rain notebooks for years. <a href="http://www.mindbird.com/rite.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.mindbird.com/rite.htm</a> I don&#8217;t love them but they have one feature that keeps me coming back. If they can get wet, very wet and are fine. Very helpful in an occupation like mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eio</title>
		<link>http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>eio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/#comment-562</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How&#039;s the paper? Looks too cold-white for me. I like to write with sepia ink, so i love warmer shades. Muji notebooks look more yellowish. I love them.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#8217;s the paper? Looks too cold-white for me. I like to write with sepia ink, so i love warmer shades. Muji notebooks look more yellowish. I love them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/#comment-546</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Damn it. Missed the second one. Thanks for the head up.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn it. Missed the second one. Thanks for the head up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Nentrup</title>
		<link>http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Nentrup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/#comment-545</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;uh...you&#039;re STILL an immobile geek. (stationery)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh&#8230;you&#8217;re STILL an immobile geek. (stationery)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hellyeahdude.com</title>
		<link>http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>hellyeahdude.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 05:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/#comment-518</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just ordered a set of these beautys, can&#039;t wait to get em!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just ordered a set of these beautys, can&#8217;t wait to get em!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/#comment-439</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, good catch. Fixed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, good catch. Fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evelyn</title>
		<link>http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>Evelyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/#comment-438</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi There I&#039;m going to give these notebooks a try.  One thing though stationery is spelt with an &#039;e&#039;.  Stationary means not moving &quot;I was a stationary geek&quot; - sounds weird.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi There I&#8217;m going to give these notebooks a try.  One thing though stationery is spelt with an &#8216;e&#8217;.  Stationary means not moving &#8220;I was a stationary geek&#8221; - sounds weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/#comment-427</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;the cahiers notebooks are much more durable.  i&#039;ve been using a field notes for about a week now and i&#039;ll be going right back to the cahier.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;cahier has a much more durable cover and the stitching on the spine wears much better in the back pocket where i carry mine.  the field notes book isn&#039;t particularly resistant to getting damp from sweat or the constant abrasion that a pocket will inflict on it. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;on the plus side, it&#039;s cute and folks that make them have done a good job of building buzz for the product.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;largely hype in my estimation and not worth the money.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the cahiers notebooks are much more durable.  i&#8217;ve been using a field notes for about a week now and i&#8217;ll be going right back to the cahier.  </p>
<p>cahier has a much more durable cover and the stitching on the spine wears much better in the back pocket where i carry mine.  the field notes book isn&#8217;t particularly resistant to getting damp from sweat or the constant abrasion that a pocket will inflict on it. </p>
<p>on the plus side, it&#8217;s cute and folks that make them have done a good job of building buzz for the product.  </p>
<p>largely hype in my estimation and not worth the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/#comment-422</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I haven&#039;t had any experience with the moleskine cahier notebooks, so I can&#039;t really compare the two. But I do have a standard pocket Molskine and the Field Notes is a much &quot;lighter&quot; alternative as I&#039;m sure the cahier&#039;s notebook is.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t had any experience with the moleskine cahier notebooks, so I can&#8217;t really compare the two. But I do have a standard pocket Molskine and the Field Notes is a much &#8220;lighter&#8221; alternative as I&#8217;m sure the cahier&#8217;s notebook is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbarraud.com/2007/09/11/field-notes/#comment-421</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;looks almost exactly like the moleskine cahier notebooks i picked up last weekend. any idea how they compare?
noted differences: graph vs lined paper, staples vs stitched binding, field notes has silly/neat stuff written on the inside covers and the latter half of the moleskine&#039;s pages are perforated for easy tear out.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks almost exactly like the moleskine cahier notebooks i picked up last weekend. any idea how they compare?<br />
noted differences: graph vs lined paper, staples vs stitched binding, field notes has silly/neat stuff written on the inside covers and the latter half of the moleskine&#8217;s pages are perforated for easy tear out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.957 seconds -->
